bio rad criterion cell system Search Results


rotofor cell  (Bio-Rad)
93
Bio-Rad rotofor cell
Rotofor Cell, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rotofor cell/product/Bio-Rad
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rotofor cell - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
mini protean tetra cell apparatus  (Bio-Rad)
97
Bio-Rad mini protean tetra cell apparatus
Mini Protean Tetra Cell Apparatus, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mini protean tetra cell apparatus/product/Bio-Rad
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mini protean tetra cell apparatus - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
mini protean tetra vertical electrophoresis cell  (Bio-Rad)
99
Bio-Rad mini protean tetra vertical electrophoresis cell
Mini Protean Tetra Vertical Electrophoresis Cell, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mini protean tetra vertical electrophoresis cell/product/Bio-Rad
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mini protean tetra vertical electrophoresis cell - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
tc20tm automated cell counter  (Bio-Rad)
97
Bio-Rad tc20tm automated cell counter
Tc20tm Automated Cell Counter, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/tc20tm automated cell counter/product/Bio-Rad
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tc20tm automated cell counter - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
protean iixi cell gel system  (Bio-Rad)
96
Bio-Rad protean iixi cell gel system
Protean Iixi Cell Gel System, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/protean iixi cell gel system/product/Bio-Rad
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
protean iixi cell gel system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
zoe fluorescent cell imager  (Bio-Rad)
96
Bio-Rad zoe fluorescent cell imager
Validation of codon‐optimised microdystrophin transgene in vitro. Transduction of AAV9K51Q‐μDys and AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys vectors in C2C12 cells (A), at an MOI: 1 × 10 5 and its quantification (B) are shown. Representative images were obtained in confocal microscope (AXR Nikon) with a 40X objective (Scale bar: 50 μm). Semi‐quantification was performed from images ( n ≥ 8 per group) obtained <t>in</t> <t>ZOE‐Fluorescent</t> cell imager. The data is represented as mean ± SD. Asterisk (*) represents statistical comparison of AAV9K51Q‐μDys and AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys treated conditions with respect to the cell control and Hash (#) refers to statistical comparison of AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys with respect to AAV9K51Q‐μDys. # p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. For statistical comparison, a one‐way ANOVA was performed (GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 software).
Zoe Fluorescent Cell Imager, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/zoe fluorescent cell imager/product/Bio-Rad
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
zoe fluorescent cell imager - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
blotting instruments  (Bio-Rad)
93
Bio-Rad blotting instruments
Validation of codon‐optimised microdystrophin transgene in vitro. Transduction of AAV9K51Q‐μDys and AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys vectors in C2C12 cells (A), at an MOI: 1 × 10 5 and its quantification (B) are shown. Representative images were obtained in confocal microscope (AXR Nikon) with a 40X objective (Scale bar: 50 μm). Semi‐quantification was performed from images ( n ≥ 8 per group) obtained <t>in</t> <t>ZOE‐Fluorescent</t> cell imager. The data is represented as mean ± SD. Asterisk (*) represents statistical comparison of AAV9K51Q‐μDys and AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys treated conditions with respect to the cell control and Hash (#) refers to statistical comparison of AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys with respect to AAV9K51Q‐μDys. # p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. For statistical comparison, a one‐way ANOVA was performed (GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 software).
Blotting Instruments, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/blotting instruments/product/Bio-Rad
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
blotting instruments - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
model 491 prep cell apparatus  (Bio-Rad)
85
Bio-Rad model 491 prep cell apparatus
Validation of codon‐optimised microdystrophin transgene in vitro. Transduction of AAV9K51Q‐μDys and AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys vectors in C2C12 cells (A), at an MOI: 1 × 10 5 and its quantification (B) are shown. Representative images were obtained in confocal microscope (AXR Nikon) with a 40X objective (Scale bar: 50 μm). Semi‐quantification was performed from images ( n ≥ 8 per group) obtained <t>in</t> <t>ZOE‐Fluorescent</t> cell imager. The data is represented as mean ± SD. Asterisk (*) represents statistical comparison of AAV9K51Q‐μDys and AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys treated conditions with respect to the cell control and Hash (#) refers to statistical comparison of AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys with respect to AAV9K51Q‐μDys. # p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. For statistical comparison, a one‐way ANOVA was performed (GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 software).
Model 491 Prep Cell Apparatus, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 85/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/model 491 prep cell apparatus/product/Bio-Rad
Average 85 stars, based on 1 article reviews
model 491 prep cell apparatus - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
85/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
bio rad ze5 cell analyzer  (Bio-Rad)
96
Bio-Rad bio rad ze5 cell analyzer
Validation of codon‐optimised microdystrophin transgene in vitro. Transduction of AAV9K51Q‐μDys and AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys vectors in C2C12 cells (A), at an MOI: 1 × 10 5 and its quantification (B) are shown. Representative images were obtained in confocal microscope (AXR Nikon) with a 40X objective (Scale bar: 50 μm). Semi‐quantification was performed from images ( n ≥ 8 per group) obtained <t>in</t> <t>ZOE‐Fluorescent</t> cell imager. The data is represented as mean ± SD. Asterisk (*) represents statistical comparison of AAV9K51Q‐μDys and AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys treated conditions with respect to the cell control and Hash (#) refers to statistical comparison of AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys with respect to AAV9K51Q‐μDys. # p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. For statistical comparison, a one‐way ANOVA was performed (GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 software).
Bio Rad Ze5 Cell Analyzer, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/bio rad ze5 cell analyzer/product/Bio-Rad
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
bio rad ze5 cell analyzer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
slides for tc20  (Bio-Rad)
96
Bio-Rad slides for tc20
Validation of codon‐optimised microdystrophin transgene in vitro. Transduction of AAV9K51Q‐μDys and AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys vectors in C2C12 cells (A), at an MOI: 1 × 10 5 and its quantification (B) are shown. Representative images were obtained in confocal microscope (AXR Nikon) with a 40X objective (Scale bar: 50 μm). Semi‐quantification was performed from images ( n ≥ 8 per group) obtained <t>in</t> <t>ZOE‐Fluorescent</t> cell imager. The data is represented as mean ± SD. Asterisk (*) represents statistical comparison of AAV9K51Q‐μDys and AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys treated conditions with respect to the cell control and Hash (#) refers to statistical comparison of AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys with respect to AAV9K51Q‐μDys. # p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. For statistical comparison, a one‐way ANOVA was performed (GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 software).
Slides For Tc20, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/slides for tc20/product/Bio-Rad
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
slides for tc20 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Validation of codon‐optimised microdystrophin transgene in vitro. Transduction of AAV9K51Q‐μDys and AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys vectors in C2C12 cells (A), at an MOI: 1 × 10 5 and its quantification (B) are shown. Representative images were obtained in confocal microscope (AXR Nikon) with a 40X objective (Scale bar: 50 μm). Semi‐quantification was performed from images ( n ≥ 8 per group) obtained in ZOE‐Fluorescent cell imager. The data is represented as mean ± SD. Asterisk (*) represents statistical comparison of AAV9K51Q‐μDys and AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys treated conditions with respect to the cell control and Hash (#) refers to statistical comparison of AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys with respect to AAV9K51Q‐μDys. # p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. For statistical comparison, a one‐way ANOVA was performed (GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 software).

Journal: Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine

Article Title: Bioengineered AAV9 and Optimised Microdystrophin Vectors Augment Phenotypic Rescue in a Murine Model of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

doi: 10.1111/jcmm.71078

Figure Lengend Snippet: Validation of codon‐optimised microdystrophin transgene in vitro. Transduction of AAV9K51Q‐μDys and AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys vectors in C2C12 cells (A), at an MOI: 1 × 10 5 and its quantification (B) are shown. Representative images were obtained in confocal microscope (AXR Nikon) with a 40X objective (Scale bar: 50 μm). Semi‐quantification was performed from images ( n ≥ 8 per group) obtained in ZOE‐Fluorescent cell imager. The data is represented as mean ± SD. Asterisk (*) represents statistical comparison of AAV9K51Q‐μDys and AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys treated conditions with respect to the cell control and Hash (#) refers to statistical comparison of AAV9K51Q‐CoμDys with respect to AAV9K51Q‐μDys. # p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. For statistical comparison, a one‐way ANOVA was performed (GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 software).

Article Snippet: The images were obtained in the ZOE‐Fluorescent cell imager (Bio‐Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and these images ( n ≥ 8/group) were further used for semi‐quantification analysis (ImageJ software).

Techniques: Biomarker Discovery, In Vitro, Transduction, Microscopy, Comparison, Control, Software